Telegram is the cheapest platform on this panel and the best covered by refills. Channel views cost two tenths of a cent per thousand, members three cents, and 145 of our 204 Telegram services carry a refill window — the highest proportion anywhere in the catalogue.
| Service | From / 1,000 | Min order | Typical start |
|---|---|---|---|
| Post views | $0.002 | 10 | under an hour |
| Channel members | $0.03 | 100 | hours |
| Reactions with views | $0.07 | 10 | 6 minutes |
| Poll votes | $0.36 | 1 | hours |
To put the first row in perspective: one dollar buys half a million post views. This is the platform where testing costs you nothing, so test properly before scaling.
Views and reactions are cosmetic and nobody audits them. Members are different: Telegram itself prunes accounts, and a channel that gains 20,000 members in a day and then loses them looks worse than one that never bought any.
Two things make the difference. First, retention: services are tagged with how long members are expected to stay, and the cheap end of the range is cheap precisely because it is not expected to hold. Second, pace — spreading 10,000 members over a week through drip-feed reads as growth, while the same number in an hour reads as a purchase.
Why refill coverage matters more here than elsewhere. 145 of 204 Telegram services carry a refill window against 8 of 89 on TikTok. On Telegram there is rarely a reason to buy an unguaranteed service — the guaranteed one usually costs a fraction of a cent more.
Telegram treats the two differently and so do the services. A channel is broadcast: members subscribe, only admins post, and view counts appear under each post. A group is a chat: members can write, and there are no per-post view counts at all.
That means view services only make sense for channels. Ordering views against a group link fails, and a failed order on a mismatched link is not refundable. Members work for both, but expect different behaviour: group members are more visible to each other, so an obviously inflated member list is noticed faster in a group than in a channel.
Two shapes of view service exist here and the difference catches people out. The plain one takes a single post link and delivers to that post. The other is written as last 5, last 10 or last 20 and spreads the quantity across that many recent posts from one order.
The spread version is the more natural-looking of the two: a channel where every post has similar view counts reads normally, while one post at 40,000 views among neighbours at 300 reads as exactly what it is. If you are maintaining a channel rather than pushing one announcement, buy the spread.
t.me username. Private invite links cannot receive delivery.t.me/channel/123); members take the channel link (t.me/channel).No. These are subscribers, not participants. If you need discussion in a group, that is a different problem and no panel solves it honestly.
Not for members or views. Make it public, order, and change it back afterwards if you want — though members added to a channel that then goes private tend not to stay.
As long as the retention window in the service name says, and no longer than the refill window lets you claim. Read both before ordering.
Yes, on any post that is still publicly reachable by link.
Ten post views. It costs a fraction of a cent, and the whole cycle from Pending to Completed takes under an hour.